Metabolism - Clinical and Experimental
Volume 56, Issue 8 , Pages 1111-1117, August 2007

Failure of Rhodiola rosea to alter skeletal muscle phosphate kinetics in trained men

  • Thomas B. Walker

      Affiliations

    • Biosciences and Protection Division, Air Force Research Laboratory, Brooks City-Base, TX 78235, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 210 536 6372; fax: +1 210 536 4042.
  • ,
  • Stephen A. Altobelli

      Affiliations

    • New Mexico Resonance, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
  • ,
  • Arvind Caprihan

      Affiliations

    • New Mexico Resonance, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
  • ,
  • Robert A. Robergs

      Affiliations

    • Exercise Physiology Laboratories, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA

Received 1 June 2006; accepted 4 April 2007.

Abstract 

Rhodiola rosea is an herbal supplement purported to improve resistance to stressors and to enhance physical performance, potentially by improving adenosine triphosphate (ATP) turnover. Phosphocreatine (PCr) kinetics serves as a reflection of ATP turnover. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the effect of R rosea ingestion on human skeletal muscle PCr recovery after exhaustive exercise. Twelve resistance-trained men, aged 19 to 39 years, completed incremental forearm wrist flexion exercise to volitional fatigue, once after ingesting 1500 mg R rosea per day for 4 days, and once after ingesting an equivalent placebo dose. During exercise and recovery from exercise, muscle phosphates were examined using phosphorus 31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. [PCr] during recovery was fit with a monoexponential function, and the resulting rate constants (k) were compared between groups. Rating of perceived exertion per stage and time to exhaustion were also compared between groups. For R rosea, k = 0.3744 ± 0.1532, whereas for placebo, k = 0.3956 ± 0.2238. Although rating of perceived exertion significantly increased within groups as workload increased, it did not differ between conditions, nor did time to exhaustion (R rosea, 10.71 ± 0.54 minutes; placebo, 10.48 ± 0.68 minutes). Estimates of [PCr] at time 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes of recovery were nearly identical between groups. In summary, there were no significant differences between groups for any of theparameters measured. Based on these results, we conclude that R rosea ingestion does not improve ATP turnover during or immediately after exercise.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0026-0495(07)00139-4

doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2007.04.004

Metabolism - Clinical and Experimental
Volume 56, Issue 8 , Pages 1111-1117, August 2007