Metabolism - Clinical and Experimental
Volume 59, Issue 2 , Pages 166-171, February 2010

Sex hormone–binding globulin and lipid profile in pubertal children

  • Carmen Garcés

      Affiliations

    • Lipid Research Unit, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +34 91 5432880; fax: +34 91 5432880.
  • ,
  • Iría de Oya

      Affiliations

    • Lipid Research Unit, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Miguel A. Lasunción

      Affiliations

    • Servicio de Bioquímica-Investigación, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá and fCIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), ISCIII, Spain
  • ,
  • Laura López-Simón

      Affiliations

    • Lipid Research Unit, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Beatriz Cano

      Affiliations

    • Lipid Research Unit, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Manuel de Oya

      Affiliations

    • Lipid Research Unit, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Received 5 December 2008; accepted 18 June 2009. published online 18 September 2009.

Abstract 

Men and women have different lipid profiles throughout life, related to changes in sex hormones; and this has been associated with sex-related differences in the prevalence of coronary heart disease. The influence of sex hormone changes during puberty on the lipid profile has been reported, but levels of sex hormone–binding globulin (SHBG) (the specific plasma binding protein of sex hormones) have not been evaluated even though its regulatory role might be crucial. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between sex hormones and SHBG and changes in plasma lipid levels during puberty. Our population-based sample included 370 healthy schoolchildren (175 male and 195 female), ranging from 12 to 15 years old. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels were significantly lower in 15-year–olds than in younger boys, and apolipoprotein (apo) A-I levels steeply decreased across the studied age groups. Parallel to these changes, testosterone levels increased whereas SHBG decreased as age increases in boys. In girls, no significant differences were observed in these variables among the age groups. Testosterone and SHBG were highly correlated with anthropometric variables. Sex hormone–binding globulin was negatively associated with triglycerides (TG) in both sexes, remaining statistically significant after further adjustment for age and body mass index (BMI) in girls. Sex hormone–binding globulin was the only predictive variable for HDL-C and TG in multiple linear regression analysis, after adjustment by BMI, in both sexes, accounting for 10% of the variance of HDL-C in boys and for around 5% of the variance of TG in both sexes. In boys, testosterone and SHBG remained significantly correlated to apo A-I levels, even after adjusting for age and BMI, and were the most important predictive variables for apo A-I in multiple linear regression analysis. In conclusion, SHBG levels are related to a decrease in HDL-C and apo A-I levels during puberty in boys and to a decrease in TG levels during puberty in both sexes.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Dedicated to Prof Manuel de Oya, as the warmest homage to his memory.

PII: S0026-0495(09)00299-6

doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2009.06.033

Metabolism - Clinical and Experimental
Volume 59, Issue 2 , Pages 166-171, February 2010