Metabolism - Clinical and Experimental
Volume 59, Issue 8 , Pages 1164-1171, August 2010

The influence of multiple indices of socioeconomic disadvantage across the adult life course on the metabolic syndrome: the Vietnam Experience Study

  • Anna C. Phillips

      Affiliations

    • School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Douglas Carroll

      Affiliations

    • School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
  • ,
  • G. Neil Thomas

      Affiliations

    • Epidemiology, Public Health and Biostatistics, School of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
  • ,
  • Catharine R. Gale

      Affiliations

    • MRC Epidemiology Resource Centre, University of Southampton, UK
  • ,
  • Ian Deary

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, UK
  • ,
  • G. David Batty

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, UK
    • MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, UK
    • The George Institute for International Health, Sydney, Australia

Received 18 August 2009; accepted 6 November 2009. published online 04 January 2010.

Abstract 

Few studies have explored the relationship between individual and combined multiple indicators of socioeconomic status across the life course and the metabolic syndrome, or attempted to understand the mechanisms underlying any associations. The present study examined the associations between 4 indicators of socioeconomic status, individually and in combination, and metabolic syndrome risk in a study of male US veterans and examined the influence of health behaviors, intelligence, and psychologic distress on these associations. Participants (N = 4253) were drawn from the Vietnam Experience Study. From military service files, telephone interviews, and a medical examination, occupational, sociodemographic, health behavior, intelligence, psychologic, and health data were collected. The 4 indices of socioeconomic status were as follows: education achieved, early adulthood income, household income in midlife, and occupational prestige in midlife. Metabolic syndrome was diagnosed from the following: body mass index, fasting blood glucose or a diagnosis of diabetes, blood pressure—a diagnosis of hypertension or taking antihypertensives, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. In models that adjusted for age, men in the lower 2 groups on the combined measure of socioeconomic status experienced a higher risk of metabolic syndrome. This association was accounted for mainly by education achieved, household income in midlife, and occupational prestige in midlife. Intelligence appeared to explain much of this association. Combined socioeconomic status measures across the life course were related to metabolic syndrome but in a threshold rather than dose-response manner. Intelligence appeared to mediate this relationship.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Ethical approval for the study was given by various bodies, including the US Centers for Disease Control.

PII: S0026-0495(09)00484-3

doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2009.11.009

Metabolism - Clinical and Experimental
Volume 59, Issue 8 , Pages 1164-1171, August 2010