Metabolism - Clinical and Experimental
Volume 59, Issue 10 , Pages 1502-1509, October 2010

Increased apolipoprotein E level and reduced high-density lipoprotein mean particle size associate with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and features of metabolic syndrome

  • Sanni Söderlund

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Biomedicum, Helsinki, Finland
  • ,
  • Hiroshi Watanabe

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Biomedicum, Helsinki, Finland
  • ,
  • Christian Ehnholm

      Affiliations

    • National Institute for Health and Welfare, Department of Chronic Disease Prevention and FIMM, Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, Biomedicum, Helsinki, Finland
  • ,
  • Matti Jauhiainen

      Affiliations

    • National Institute for Health and Welfare, Department of Chronic Disease Prevention and FIMM, Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, Biomedicum, Helsinki, Finland
  • ,
  • Marja-Riitta Taskinen

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Biomedicum, Helsinki, Finland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki, PO Box 700, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland.

Received 26 June 2009; accepted 21 January 2010. published online 08 March 2010.

Abstract 

The metabolic syndrome (MetS) pandemic predisposes patients to low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). To successfully treat low HDL-C, there is an urgent need for a better understanding of the changes in HDL particles in the low–HDL-C state. Especially, apolipoprotein (apo) E metabolism in HDL particles is an emerging and important issue. Therefore, we determined HDL subspecies, apo E distribution, and the impact of the MetS in subjects with low and high HDL-C. We studied 246 subjects derived from the Finnish Health 2000 Health Examination Survey. The 2 groups included 113 low–HDL-C (≤10th percentile) and 133 high–HDL-C (≥90th percentile) subjects. The low–HDL-C subjects had higher apo E concentration (39.4 ± 19.4 vs 25.6 ± 8.0 μg/mL, P < .001) and smaller HDL mean particle size (9.0 ± 0.2 vs 9.8 ± 0.3 nm, P < .001). The distribution of apo E genetic isoforms could not explain the difference. Apolipoprotein E content of very low-density lipoprotein particles was comparable between the study groups. In the low–HDL-C subjects, apo E level in large HDL particles was lower (P < .001) compared with that in the high–HDL-C subjects. The subjects with MetS had smaller HDL mean particle size and higher serum apo E concentration. Serum apo E concentration associated positively with different MetS markers (waist circumference, triglycerides, and glucose), whereas HDL mean particle size associated with those negatively. Our results highlight that, in the low–HDL-C state, there are changes in the size and composition of HDL particles associating with MetS. Apolipoprotein E, although generally considered antiatherogenic, associates with MetS and low HDL-C. Our results emphasize the need for a better understanding of apo E metabolism in HDL particles.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Each study subject gave a written informed consent before participating in the study. The samples were collected in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the ethics committees of the participating centers approved the study design.

PII: S0026-0495(10)00030-2

doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2010.01.015

Metabolism - Clinical and Experimental
Volume 59, Issue 10 , Pages 1502-1509, October 2010